Der BVB spielt mit: Weidenfeller, Subotic, Lewandowski, Hummels, Barrios, Großkreutz, Bender, Piszczek, Schmelzer, Götze, da Silva. 0. min Spielstand: Borussia Dortmund hat den angestrebten Auswärtssieg verpasst und kam am Spieltag der Fußball-Bundesliga nur zu einem Spiel-Bilanz aller Duelle zwischen Borussia Dortmund und 1. FC Nürnberg sowie die letzten Spiele untereinander. Darstellung der Heimbilanz von Borussia.
0:0 – Borussia beißt sich am FCN-Bollwerk die Zähne ausLiveticker zur Partie 1. FC Nürnberg - Borussia Dortmund am Spieltag 22 der Bundesliga-Saison / Borussia Dortmund vs. kandooband.com Nürnberg: So könnten der BVB spielen. Am Mittwochabend empfängt der BVB im heimischen Signal-Iduna-Park den Club aus. Schluss! Das Gros der Zuschauer jubelt - denn der 1. FC Nürnberg trennt sich mit einem von Borussia Dortmund. Für den BVB ist es das bereits fünfte Spiel.
Bvb Fcn section navigation VideoFCN-BVB Elfmeter 28.10
German Bundesliga Champions League 1. Round Our fans' representatives are the first point of contact for any fan-related topics.
They are eager to develop new ideas and always open for suggestions. Submerge yourself in the most intense football experience in Germany.
See for yourself why the London Times newspaper hailed ours as the best football stadium in Borussia Dortmund stands for intensity, authenticity, cohesion and ambition.
There's an intense character to everything we do. Lewandowski stepped up but, with virtually all Club players on the goalline, his powerful shot got stuck in the wall.
After 29 minutes, BVB had seven shots on goal, while Nuremberg had yet to produce a single effort on target, but a communication error between Sokratis and Hummels Pekhart almost turned the game on its head as Pekhart latched on to the ball and ran clear, but Weidenfeller quickly rushed out of his goal to narrow the angle and in a fantastic save managed to get his fingertips on the shot to deflect it onto the post.
It was the 19 th time this season the Club have hit the woodwork. Borussia were lucky here, but in the second half they quickly put the game out of reach for the visitors.
A Sahin free-kick from the left found Lewandowski in the centre and the BVB striker rose highest to steer a powerful header towards goal.
Schäfer somehow got a hand onto it, but Hummels was hand to tap the loose ball home to put Borussia in front 51 mins. Mkhitaryan could have made only four minutes later after Grosskreutz chipped a soft cross from the left to Aubameyang who flicked the ball perfectly into the path of the Armenian, but Schäfer did well again to push his header over the crossbar.
The Nuremberg keeper was eventually beaten again on 64 minutes when Mkhitaryan picked out the unmarked Lewandowski at the edge of the penalty box and the Polish striker made no mistake and coolly fired into the bottom right corner from the edge of the box to make it , leaving Schäfer no chance.
Borussia went on to dominate the rest of the game and pushed for a third. After good work from Lewandowki, Mkhitaryan saw his effort from 12 yards saved well by Schäfer on 73 minutes.
Published duration 4 November. Published duration 3 November. Published duration 28 October. Published duration 27 October.
Published duration 20 October. Attribution Champions League. Published duration 19 October. Page 1 of 4. Local authorities do not have such power for video recordings.
Under the Video Recording Act , all non-exempt recordings must be classified by an authority chosen by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport.
This classification is legally binding, in that supply of material contrary to its certificate recordings that have been refused a certificate, or supplying to someone younger than the certified age is a criminal offence.
However, possession is not an offence in itself, other than in the case of "possession with intent to supply". In theory this authority could be revoked, but in practice such a revocation has never been suggested, since most local authorities simply don't have the resources needed to do such things as remove cuts, pass films that the BBFC rejected and vice versa, put in place new cuts, etc.
The BBFC can also advise cuts for a less-restrictive rating. This generally occurs in borderline cases where distributors have requested a certificate and the BBFC has rated the work at a more-restrictive level; however, some cuts are compulsory, such as scenes that violate the Protection of Children Act or Cinematograph Films Animals Act The final certificate then depends on the distributor's decision on whether or not to make the suggested cuts.
Some works are even rejected if the distributor refuses the cut. The examiners and the directors of the BBFC are hired on a permanent basis.
Examiners are required to watch 5 hours 20 mins of media, to a maximum of 35 hours a week. Turnover is low and vacancies, when available, appear on its London job vacancies website.
The BBFC has also rated some video games. Normally these are exempt from classification, unless they depict human sexual activity, human genital organs or gross acts of violence, in which case the publishers should submit the game for classification.
Publishers may opt to submit a game for classification even if they are not obliged to. The BBFC also provide a classification service for mobile phone operators.
BBFC guidelines for film and video are used to calibrate the filters used by the operators to restrict access to internet content.
The default assumption is that mobile phone users are under 18 years of age. The BBFC guidelines are based on public consultations conducted every 4—5 years.
As regulator, the BBFC was intended to be responsible for identifying commercial pornographic websites accessible in the UK and empowered to take action against any which did not age-verify their users, including placing restrictions on their payment transactions or ordering their blocking by Internet service providers.
This was to be the case regardless of whether the websites were UK-based or foreign-based. The BBFC had been informally named as the likely regulator in ,   and in November of that year it was invited to take on the role and agreed to do so.
Before the BBFC was due to begin its role, it conducted a public consultation on its draft guidance beginning in March In March the BBFC published its guidance, which stated that social media would not fall under the BBFC's jurisdiction, and nor would websites where pornography made up a third or less of the website's material.
The BBFC proposed that a voluntary certification scheme should cover age verification providers. The BBFC currently issues the following certificates.
The current category symbols were introduced in October , replacing the previous ones that had been in place since May have adolescent themes.
May contain discrimination, soft drugs, moderate language, moderate violence, sex references and nudity. Sexual activity may be briefly and discreetly portrayed.
Use of strong language or very strong language may be permitted based on frequency and how it is used, as well as contextual justification.
More cuts are demanded in this category than any other category. Material that is exempt from classification sometimes uses symbols similar to BBFC certificates, for example an E "certificate".
There is no legal obligation, nor a particular scheme, for labelling material that is exempt from classification. Plans to mandate online age-verification to deny those who do not prove they are aged over 18 access to pornographic website content were subsequently abandoned.
Historically the Board has faced strong criticism for their overzealous attitude towards censoring films. Prior to the liberalising decade of the s, films were routinely and extensively censored as a means of social control.
For example, Rebel Without a Cause was cut to reduce the "possibility of teenage rebellion". Ingmar Bergman's Smiles of a Summer Night was cut to remove "overtly sexual or provocative" language.
The BBFC's attitude became more liberal during the s, and it concentrated on censoring films that featured graphic sex and violence. However, some Board decisions caused controversy in the s when it banned a series of films that were released uncut and were popular in other countries such as The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and Last House on the Left , or released other controversial films, such as Straw Dogs and A Clockwork Orange.
However, under recent President Andreas Whittam Smith and current incumbent Sir Quentin Thomas , guidelines have been relaxed again, allowing the release, usually uncut, of these previously banned films on video and in cinemas.
Some films from the s remain unreleased,  but many of these titles remain banned primarily because their distributors have not chosen to re-submit the films to the BBFC, almost certainly for commercial reasons.
If they were, they would be likely to receive a more sympathetic hearing than 30 to 40 years ago. Two notable examples from this period include the film Love Camp 7 , rejected in , and Women in Cellblock 9 , released in and rejected in Both films contain substantial scenes of sexual violence and have remained completely banned following a re-submission since In general, attitudes to what material is suitable for viewing by younger audiences have changed over the years, and this is reflected by the reclassification of older films being re-released on video.
For example, a film given the former A rating could very probably be rated PG today. An extreme example of this is the rating of the horror film Revenge of the Zombies , with a U certificate upon its video release in the late s, whereas, when it was first examined as a film in , it was given one of the first X ratings.
The Bela Lugosi horror film Island of Lost Souls was refused a certificate when first submitted in , was granted an X in the s, and a 12 for home video release in — when submitted for a modern video classification in , it was re-classified as a PG.
The BBFC are also known to cut the words "spaz" and "retard" from U certified films and videos on the grounds of discrimination though "spaz" is not considered as derogatory in the United States as it is in the United Kingdom: "spaz" in American slang means "someone who overreacts to a minor problem": in British English it is a slang word for spastic The British Spastics Society changed its name to Scope because the word was used as a general term of abuse and not in its former sense of someone with particular mental or physical disabilities.
One example of this was when Marmaduke was passed U after the word "spaz" was removed. The uncut version would have been rated They also award higher ratings to films that contain potentially imitable and dangerous behaviour; this includes all three Jackass films being passed 18, and Fred: The Movie being passed They are also very serious about suicide themes, references, or attempts, and will either cut them or award a higher rating.
An example of this was in , when the Board cut the Hindi film Anjaana Anjaani by two minutes and thirty-one seconds to remove references to and sight of someone attempting suicide by asphyxiation so the distributor could get a cinema 12A certificate.
Nürnberg seemed deflated at conceding the second goal, and could only muster a speculative effort from distance from Bunjaku in the 89th minute, before referee Florian Meyer called time on proceedings.
Despite the disappointment of another defeat, there were positive signs for 1. FCN, particularly in view of their first half performance.
They next face a mammoth game away at FC Augsburg on matchday What did the players and managers think of the game today?
Find out all match reaction here:.